Czechoslovakian vs Palestinian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Palestinian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Palestinians
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Palestinian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,467,863 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,371,597 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 0.80%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Palestinian |
| Minimum | 0.52% | 0.63% |
| Maximum | 32.3% | 27.9% |
| Range | 31.8% | 27.3% |
| Mean | 13.5% | 12.0% |
| Median | 12.3% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Palestinians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Belgian (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Denmark (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and English (12.4%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |