Czechoslovakian vs Pima Female Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Pima
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Pima
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Pima Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,467,863 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,212 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.588 and weighted average of 23.6%, a difference of 89.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Pima |
| Minimum | 0.52% | 5.7% |
| Maximum | 32.3% | 79.5% |
| Range | 31.8% | 73.8% |
| Mean | 13.5% | 28.6% |
| Median | 12.3% | 24.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 37.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 19.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 16.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 15.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Belgian (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Denmark (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and English (12.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Lumbee (23.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Navajo (23.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Yemen (22.8%, a difference of 3.3%), Crow (22.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and Puerto Rican (25.2%, a difference of 6.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 25.9% |