Czechoslovakian vs European Female Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
European
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Europeans
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs European Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,467,863 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,757,214 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.574 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 1.3%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czechoslovakian | European |
Minimum | 0.52% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 32.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 31.8% | 98.1% |
Mean | 13.5% | 22.2% |
Median | 12.3% | 14.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 23.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 12.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 20.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 20.5% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Europeans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Belgian (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Denmark (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), English (12.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Finnish (12.4%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Europeans are Immigrants from Canada (12.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Zimbabwean (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (12.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Serbian (12.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and Egyptian (12.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |