Costa Rican vs Creek Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Creek
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Costa Ricans
Creek
16.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
64.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Creek Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,202,107 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.463 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,262,374 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 21.7%, a difference of 34.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Creek |
Minimum | 2.0% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 80.0% | 77.8% |
Range | 78.0% | 72.7% |
Mean | 19.6% | 31.3% |
Median | 15.0% | 28.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.4% | 40.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 20.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.0% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.8% | 15.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Venezuela (16.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Yugoslavian (16.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Uruguayan (16.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Afghan (16.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 64.2 /100 | #170 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 64.0 /100 | #171 | Good 16.2% |
Afghans | 62.3 /100 | #172 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | South America | 55.1 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
Ethiopians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.5% |
Lebanese | 45.4 /100 | #175 | Average 16.6% |
Hungarians | 45.1 /100 | #176 | Average 16.6% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |