Costa Rican vs Arab Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Arab
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Costa Ricans
Arabs
16.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
64.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
34.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Arab Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,202,107 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.463 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 474,430,772 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.557 and weighted average of 16.8%, a difference of 3.6%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Arab |
Minimum | 2.0% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 80.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 78.0% | 96.3% |
Mean | 19.6% | 26.3% |
Median | 15.0% | 17.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 14.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.4% | 31.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 17.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.0% | 19.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.8% | 19.7% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Arabs by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Venezuela (16.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Yugoslavian (16.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Afghan (16.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from South America (16.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Immigrants from Morocco (16.8%, a difference of 0.010%), South American Indian (16.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Uruguay (16.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Scotch-Irish (16.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Portugal (16.6%, a difference of 0.96%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 64.2 /100 | #170 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 64.0 /100 | #171 | Good 16.2% |
Afghans | 62.3 /100 | #172 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | South America | 55.1 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
Ethiopians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.5% |
Lebanese | 45.4 /100 | #175 | Average 16.6% |
Hungarians | 45.1 /100 | #176 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 44.1 /100 | #177 | Average 16.6% |
Whites/Caucasians | 43.6 /100 | #178 | Average 16.6% |
Hawaiians | 43.4 /100 | #179 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Syria | 43.3 /100 | #180 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 43.2 /100 | #181 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 43.1 /100 | #182 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 42.5 /100 | #183 | Average 16.6% |
Scotch-Irish | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 16.7% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 35.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 16.7% |
South American Indians | 35.0 /100 | #186 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 34.6 /100 | #187 | Fair 16.8% |
Arabs | 34.5 /100 | #188 | Fair 16.8% |