Costa Rican vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,202,107 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.463 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,396,670 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 20.6%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Costa Rican	Immigrants from China
Minimum	2.0%	1.1%
Maximum	80.0%	24.4%
Range	78.0%	23.3%
Mean	19.6%	12.0%
Median	15.0%	11.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.9%	8.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	20.4%	14.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.5%	5.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	17.0%	4.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	16.8%	4.7%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Venezuela (16.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Yugoslavian (16.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Uruguayan (16.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Afghan (16.2%, a difference of 0.24%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
French Canadians	68.7 /100 \| #162	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Oceania	68.4 /100 \| #163	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Colombia	67.8 /100 \| #164	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Germany	67.3 /100 \| #165	Good 16.1%
South Americans	67.2 /100 \| #166	Good 16.1%
Uruguayans	64.7 /100 \| #167	Good 16.2%
Yugoslavians	64.4 /100 \| #168	Good 16.2%
Costa Ricans	64.2 /100 \| #169	Good 16.2%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	64.2 /100 \| #170	Good 16.2%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	64.0 /100 \| #171	Good 16.2%
Afghans	62.3 /100 \| #172	Good 16.2%
Immigrants \| South America	55.1 /100 \| #173	Average 16.4%
Ethiopians	50.0 /100 \| #174	Average 16.5%
Lebanese	45.4 /100 \| #175	Average 16.6%
Hungarians	45.1 /100 \| #176	Average 16.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Korea	99.9 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 13.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 13.2%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 13.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 13.3%
Indians (Asian)	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 13.3%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 13.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 13.4%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.4%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Tongans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.6%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Asians	99.7 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.7%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.7%
Danes	99.7 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.7%