Arab vs Immigrants from Uruguay Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Arab
Immigrants from Uruguay
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Arabs
Immigrants from Uruguay
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
70.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
77.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arab vs Immigrants from Uruguay Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 476,036,809 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.440 and weighted average of 20.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,556,340 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.503 and weighted average of 20.6%, a difference of 0.57%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Arab | Immigrants from Uruguay |
Minimum | 5.5% | 10.4% |
Maximum | 53.6% | 60.0% |
Range | 48.1% | 49.6% |
Mean | 23.1% | 29.9% |
Median | 19.2% | 21.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 18.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.9% | 47.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 29.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 15.3% |
Demographics Similar to Arabs and Immigrants from Uruguay by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.15%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Puget Sound Salish (20.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |