West Indian In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
West Indian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
West Indian In Labor Force | Age > 16
64.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
3.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
West Indian In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,052,877 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of West Indians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520 and weighted average of 64.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in West Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.63% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of West Indians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of West Indians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if West Indians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to West Indians by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to West Indians are Tsimshian (64.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Lebanon (64.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Netherlands (64.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Dominica (64.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (64.5%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Lebanese | 3.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 64.5% |
| Immigrants from Hungary | 3.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 64.5% |
| Immigrants from Bangladesh | 3.6 /100 | #240 | Tragic 64.5% |
| Immigrants from Dominica | 3.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 64.5% |
| Immigrants from Netherlands | 3.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 64.5% |
| Immigrants from Lebanon | 3.2 /100 | #243 | Tragic 64.5% |
| Tsimshian | 3.1 /100 | #244 | Tragic 64.5% |
| West Indians | 3.0 /100 | #245 | Tragic 64.5% |
| Immigrants from Caribbean | 2.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 64.4% |
| Swiss | 2.1 /100 | #247 | Tragic 64.4% |
| Immigrants from Barbados | 2.1 /100 | #248 | Tragic 64.4% |
| Germans | 1.8 /100 | #249 | Tragic 64.4% |
| British West Indians | 1.8 /100 | #250 | Tragic 64.4% |
| Portuguese | 1.6 /100 | #251 | Tragic 64.4% |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 1.5 /100 | #252 | Tragic 64.4% |
West Indian In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | West Indian Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.054% | 37.5% |
| Maximum | 30.1% | 87.9% |
| Range | 30.1% | 50.4% |
| Mean | 5.2% | 64.8% |
| Median | 3.2% | 65.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 60.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 66.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 7.8% |
Correlation Details
| West Indian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054% | 173,643,513 | 65.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 39,803,517 | 65.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 13,177,815 | 65.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.51% | 6,145,025 | 65.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 4,092,135 | 65.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 2,017,481 | 65.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 10,358,686 | 63.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 1,094,105 | 66.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 571,758 | 62.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 307,467 | 65.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.56% | 439,701 | 60.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 336,886 | 59.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.85% | 188,413 | 66.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.02% | 137,340 | 59.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.15% | 201,312 | 60.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.32% | 142,294 | 66.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.42% | 208,855 | 66.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.59% | 150,463 | 61.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 287,567 | 60.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 48,107 | 58.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.05% | 5,344 | 65.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 14,763 | 61.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.32% | 190,474 | 65.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.61% | 75,725 | 64.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.85% | 4,648 | 60.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.98% | 69,375 | 69.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.23% | 1,158 | 64.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.36% | 8,164 | 63.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.52% | 22,122 | 66.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 912 | 64.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.81% | 3,181 | 37.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.17% | 6,851 | 69.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.50% | 32,296 | 62.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.88% | 85,425 | 62.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.93% | 83,125 | 59.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.09% | 286 | 52.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.85% | 3,117 | 69.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.06% | 10,526 | 68.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.27% | 78,506 | 60.3% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.21% | 571 | 86.3% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.26% | 326 | 87.9% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.74% | 1,782 | 79.8% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.11% | 1,760 | 77.8% |