Turkish In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Turkish
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Turkish In Labor Force | Age > 16
66.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,859,072 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.137 and weighted average of 66.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.26% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Turks and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Turks influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Turks simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Turks by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Malaysian (66.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Moldova (66.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Asia (66.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Malaysia (66.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and Moroccan (66.1%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Taiwanese | 99.7 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 66.2% |
Immigrants from Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 66.2% |
Immigrants from Korea | 99.7 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 66.2% |
Immigrants from Singapore | 99.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 66.2% |
Immigrants from Malaysia | 99.6 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants from Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants from Asia | 99.6 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Turks | 99.6 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Malaysians | 99.6 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Moroccans | 99.5 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 66.1% |
German Russians | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants from Jordan | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Central Americans | 99.4 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Mongolians | 99.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 66.1% |
South Americans | 99.4 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Turkish In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.061% | 31.7% |
Maximum | 29.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 29.4% | 68.3% |
Mean | 4.7% | 63.7% |
Median | 3.3% | 65.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 61.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 66.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 9.5% |
Correlation Details
Turkish Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.061% | 189,249,669 | 65.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.20% | 49,241,067 | 66.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 14,871,965 | 66.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.51% | 7,043,283 | 66.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 3,926,514 | 66.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 2,298,833 | 66.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94% | 1,523,459 | 65.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 754,314 | 66.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 612,680 | 66.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 451,621 | 66.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 542,506 | 64.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 261,797 | 65.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.83% | 294,868 | 66.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.98% | 148,588 | 64.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 97,197 | 65.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.31% | 67,365 | 66.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.40% | 61,942 | 66.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.56% | 50,190 | 64.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 33,548 | 60.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 54,287 | 63.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.01% | 52,389 | 67.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 3,611 | 65.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 17,340 | 59.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.42% | 1,314 | 60.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.62% | 33,609 | 66.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.73% | 31,781 | 67.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.90% | 13,394 | 64.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.10% | 11,623 | 61.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18% | 26,829 | 72.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.29% | 19,287 | 73.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.47% | 10,897 | 58.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.08% | 59 | 50.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.19% | 1,463 | 66.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.30% | 434 | 50.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.51% | 381 | 61.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.13% | 1,616 | 52.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.44% | 21,950 | 67.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.66% | 4,150 | 68.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.36% | 11,458 | 66.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.17% | 1,669 | 67.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.10% | 5,476 | 59.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.04% | 1,857 | 34.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.91% | 235 | 58.4% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.16% | 148 | 67.5% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.27% | 375 | 31.7% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.41% | 34 | 100.0% |