Immigrants from Russia In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Russia
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Immigrants from Russia In Labor Force | Age > 16
65.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
75.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Russia In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 347,958,587 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.301 and weighted average of 65.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.44% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Russia and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Russia influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Immigrants from Russia simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Russia by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Russia are Immigrants from Ireland (65.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Armenia (65.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Panamanian (65.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Syria (65.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from South Africa (65.3%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Immigrants | 81.9 /100 | #150 | Excellent 65.4% |
Czechs | 81.5 /100 | #151 | Excellent 65.4% |
Yugoslavians | 81.3 /100 | #152 | Excellent 65.4% |
Immigrants from China | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 65.4% |
Immigrants from Eastern Europe | 78.3 /100 | #154 | Good 65.4% |
Immigrants from Armenia | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants from Ireland | 75.9 /100 | #156 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants from Russia | 75.7 /100 | #157 | Good 65.3% |
Panamanians | 75.2 /100 | #158 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants from Syria | 74.6 /100 | #159 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants from South Africa | 73.5 /100 | #160 | Good 65.3% |
Australians | 71.3 /100 | #161 | Good 65.3% |
Albanians | 70.8 /100 | #162 | Good 65.3% |
South Africans | 69.8 /100 | #163 | Good 65.3% |
Danes | 68.8 /100 | #164 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants from Russia In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Russia Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.071% | 38.9% |
Maximum | 34.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 34.5% | 61.1% |
Mean | 7.6% | 64.5% |
Median | 5.2% | 64.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 59.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.7% | 67.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 11.0% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Russia Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.071% | 227,521,254 | 65.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.24% | 56,892,776 | 66.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.40% | 25,677,438 | 66.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 12,712,077 | 67.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 14,365,465 | 64.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94% | 3,304,702 | 65.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 1,880,496 | 65.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 1,532,313 | 65.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 1,159,719 | 65.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 725,648 | 65.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.78% | 289,878 | 65.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.99% | 238,057 | 62.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 274,731 | 64.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.30% | 152,699 | 67.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.49% | 120,260 | 65.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66% | 184,500 | 63.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.81% | 264,974 | 61.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.97% | 133,358 | 68.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.12% | 128,379 | 61.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.37% | 12,726 | 74.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 52,850 | 57.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 9,462 | 63.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.89% | 5,292 | 63.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.07% | 23,266 | 53.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.19% | 22,161 | 67.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.44% | 2,768 | 61.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.54% | 1,321 | 63.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.70% | 4,064 | 62.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.06% | 9,047 | 64.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.25% | 23,435 | 55.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.36% | 261 | 48.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.58% | 2,704 | 66.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.77% | 81,109 | 58.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.35% | 63 | 39.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.53% | 1,990 | 48.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.83% | 1,318 | 74.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 47,893 | 43.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.39% | 155 | 76.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.89% | 2,564 | 82.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.41% | 574 | 52.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.59% | 1,523 | 53.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00% | 80 | 60.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.13% | 3,338 | 72.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.66% | 83,069 | 56.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.90% | 462 | 58.5% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.34% | 154 | 38.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.36% | 437 | 58.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.64% | 1,543 | 78.8% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.88% | 427 | 59.6% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.61% | 1,102 | 67.9% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.77% | 138 | 63.4% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.19% | 867 | 64.9% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.02% | 181 | 100.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.25% | 126 | 81.6% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.10% | 891 | 77.4% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.24% | 202 | 100.0% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.31% | 274 | 70.8% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.62% | 26 | 65.4% |