Jordanian In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Jordanian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Jordanian In Labor Force | Age > 16
66.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,424,117 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.081 and weighted average of 66.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.16% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Jordanians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Jordanians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Jordanians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Sri Lankan (66.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Egyptian (66.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Venezuelan (66.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Peruvian (66.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Peru (66.3%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Immigrants from Turkey | 99.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Immigrants from Peru | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | 99.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Indonesians | 99.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Venezuelans | 99.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Peruvians | 99.8 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Sri Lankans | 99.8 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Egyptians | 99.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 66.2% |
Immigrants from Egypt | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 66.2% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 66.2% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 66.2% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 66.2% |
Taiwanese | 99.7 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 66.2% |
Immigrants from Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 66.2% |
Jordanian In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.034% | 50.2% |
Maximum | 18.5% | 80.6% |
Range | 18.5% | 30.4% |
Mean | 3.1% | 65.6% |
Median | 2.3% | 65.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.1% | 62.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.3% | 68.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 6.3% |
Correlation Details
Jordanian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.034% | 122,913,844 | 66.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 22,185,516 | 66.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 8,457,233 | 66.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 3,368,429 | 66.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.41% | 2,332,544 | 66.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.51% | 2,330,249 | 67.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 861,646 | 66.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 672,003 | 65.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.79% | 665,415 | 66.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 480,928 | 63.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 434,656 | 68.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.06% | 443,461 | 63.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 82,250 | 65.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 112,755 | 64.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 154,050 | 67.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.43% | 190,537 | 67.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 119,427 | 57.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 117,444 | 72.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 22,769 | 65.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 43,541 | 62.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.92% | 39,861 | 64.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.01% | 50,561 | 74.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.06% | 11,189 | 65.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 1,155 | 62.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 31,259 | 62.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 14,915 | 68.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 55,025 | 63.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.59% | 23,173 | 58.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.62% | 38,144 | 58.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 17,280 | 70.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.14% | 3,317 | 80.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 8,535 | 71.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.37% | 3,532 | 79.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,804 | 72.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.75% | 12,305 | 64.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.82% | 11,977 | 63.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 38,010 | 68.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.42% | 8,220 | 54.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.65% | 20,564 | 63.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.92% | 1,381 | 63.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.11% | 1,468 | 55.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.55% | 9,960 | 69.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.59% | 6,496 | 50.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.01% | 8,024 | 75.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.50% | 400 | 58.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.69% | 182 | 56.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.09% | 371 | 57.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.41% | 10,258 | 68.1% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.52% | 54 | 80.6% |