Chickasaw vs Ute In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Ute
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Chickasaw
Ute
62.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
60.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Ute In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,722,257 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 62.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,668,599 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.640 and weighted average of 60.9%, a difference of 2.3%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Ute |
| Minimum | 28.7% | 19.4% |
| Maximum | 76.1% | 66.7% |
| Range | 47.4% | 47.3% |
| Mean | 55.2% | 51.3% |
| Median | 56.5% | 53.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 50.9% | 41.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 61.1% | 61.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.2% | 19.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 11.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Ute by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Kiowa (62.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Arapaho (62.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Yakama (62.1%, a difference of 0.25%), American (62.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and Ottawa (62.0%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Crow (60.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Paiute (60.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Apache (60.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Creek (61.3%, a difference of 0.71%), and Choctaw (61.5%, a difference of 0.94%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 62.8% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 62.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 62.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.8% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 61.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 61.5% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 61.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 60.9% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 60.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 60.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 60.7% |