Ecuadorian In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Ecuadorian In Labor Force | Age > 16
65.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
94.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,862,233 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 65.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ecuadorians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ecuadorians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Ecuadorians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (65.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Philippines (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guatemala (65.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Icelander (65.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and Norwegian (65.7%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
New Zealanders | 96.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants from Ecuador | 95.9 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants from Iraq | 95.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Iraqis | 95.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Norwegians | 95.3 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Koreans | 95.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants from Eastern Asia | 94.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Ecuadorians | 94.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants from Philippines | 94.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants from Guatemala | 94.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Icelanders | 94.3 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants from North Macedonia | 94.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants from Lithuania | 93.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Costa Ricans | 93.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Guatemalans | 92.5 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Ecuadorian In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.10% | 51.2% |
Maximum | 35.8% | 77.9% |
Range | 35.7% | 26.7% |
Mean | 10.8% | 66.7% |
Median | 9.1% | 66.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 65.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 68.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 4.1% |
Correlation Details
Ecuadorian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 225,966,817 | 65.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 35,455,147 | 66.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74% | 18,239,071 | 65.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 7,929,214 | 65.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 4,841,795 | 65.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.64% | 3,863,634 | 65.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 1,926,871 | 67.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 10,140,357 | 63.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.49% | 1,889,443 | 65.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.82% | 1,070,606 | 66.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 1,010,740 | 65.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 701,516 | 66.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 275,994 | 67.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.04% | 212,133 | 63.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.28% | 370,549 | 69.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.62% | 297,502 | 62.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.94% | 76,880 | 66.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 295,399 | 68.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.45% | 98,704 | 65.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.79% | 75,504 | 66.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.10% | 159,101 | 66.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.41% | 105,683 | 68.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.71% | 199,062 | 67.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.97% | 101,959 | 68.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.25% | 222,817 | 64.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.52% | 183,356 | 68.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.83% | 150,353 | 66.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.12% | 107,043 | 66.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.53% | 156,526 | 66.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 334,815 | 63.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.07% | 31,554 | 63.9% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.34% | 12,343 | 77.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.74% | 51,505 | 61.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.96% | 227,148 | 68.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.20% | 32,963 | 66.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.58% | 91,516 | 69.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.78% | 86,963 | 70.3% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.43% | 22,800 | 51.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.65% | 127,356 | 65.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.90% | 112,396 | 67.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 100,539 | 66.5% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.11% | 9,606 | 64.1% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.78% | 112,299 | 71.2% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.12% | 70,524 | 64.5% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.65% | 42,547 | 62.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.89% | 27,708 | 64.2% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.59% | 9,126 | 72.9% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.43% | 11,777 | 66.0% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.72% | 1,078 | 69.3% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.55% | 275 | 70.6% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.11% | 21,040 | 66.3% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.04% | 1,231 | 76.4% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.25% | 5,946 | 72.7% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.28% | 1,077 | 58.5% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.68% | 5,587 | 73.2% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.08% | 1,005 | 74.5% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.90% | 112,750 | 67.3% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.24% | 56,696 | 67.6% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.90% | 9,162 | 67.7% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.59% | 4,407 | 57.9% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.76% | 2,718 | 67.7% |