Japanese In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Japanese
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Japanese In Labor Force | Age > 16
65.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,190,051 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Japanese and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 65.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.00027% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Japanese and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Japanese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Japanese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Japanese by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Honduras (65.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (65.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Japan (65.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Laotian (65.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Poland (65.8%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | 98.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Palestinians | 98.5 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Colombians | 98.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants from Serbia | 98.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Immigrants from Poland | 98.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Immigrants from Spain | 98.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Immigrants from Japan | 98.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Japanese | 97.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Immigrants from Honduras | 97.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Laotians | 97.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Pakistanis | 97.1 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Hondurans | 97.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Immigrants from Indonesia | 96.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Argentineans | 96.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Immigrants from Iran | 96.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Japanese In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.089% | 26.8% |
| Maximum | 46.8% | 86.5% |
| Range | 46.7% | 59.7% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 62.1% |
| Median | 6.9% | 65.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.3% | 59.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 67.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.7% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 10.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 10.3% |
Correlation Details
| Japanese Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.089% | 191,236,115 | 66.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 32,062,027 | 66.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 11,053,025 | 66.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 5,586,569 | 66.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 2,875,177 | 66.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.51% | 1,552,121 | 66.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 1,269,770 | 65.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.09% | 537,392 | 64.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 401,596 | 65.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.64% | 83,848 | 66.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.93% | 184,192 | 66.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.15% | 208,256 | 67.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.43% | 147,545 | 65.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.81% | 638,209 | 66.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.08% | 60,107 | 62.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.30% | 473,882 | 62.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.57% | 68,008 | 59.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.73% | 74,695 | 61.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.21% | 41,240 | 69.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.34% | 5,600 | 55.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.64% | 104,251 | 64.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.96% | 70,818 | 65.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.54% | 65,608 | 66.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.83% | 278 | 55.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.99% | 41,001 | 67.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.29% | 645 | 26.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.63% | 59,153 | 65.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.23% | 4,145 | 67.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.84% | 12,324 | 68.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.91% | 11,678 | 70.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.38% | 2,911 | 76.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.81% | 59,460 | 57.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.92% | 27,848 | 62.4% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.25% | 2,588 | 49.4% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.88% | 132 | 64.4% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.86% | 114,737 | 67.3% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.08% | 1,364 | 59.4% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.72% | 2,215 | 48.1% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.30% | 411 | 71.8% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.47% | 868 | 37.8% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.03% | 7,118 | 39.7% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.70% | 1,575 | 45.8% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.12% | 5,478 | 49.9% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.24% | 921 | 46.4% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.73% | 32,323 | 71.3% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.86% | 388 | 71.4% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.81% | 219 | 86.5% |
[ 46.5% - 47.0% ] 46.82% | 220 | 65.4% |