Zimbabwean In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Zimbabwean In Labor Force | Age > 16
67.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,208,654 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.017 and weighted average of 67.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.047% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Zimbabweans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Zimbabweans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Zimbabweans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Cabo Verde (67.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Morocco (67.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Africa (67.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Thai (67.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Zaire (67.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Immigrants from Kenya | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 67.6% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 67.5% |
Immigrants from Uganda | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 67.5% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Ugandans | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Immigrants from Africa | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 67.3% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 67.3% |
Immigrants from Morocco | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Immigrants from Zaire | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Ghanaians | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 67.1% |
Immigrants from Congo | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 67.1% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 67.1% |
Immigrants from Ghana | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 67.1% |
Zimbabwean In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.0070% | 51.3% |
Maximum | 12.0% | 77.0% |
Range | 12.0% | 25.7% |
Mean | 1.2% | 67.0% |
Median | 0.65% | 67.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.29% | 65.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.5% | 69.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 4.9% |
Correlation Details
Zimbabwean Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.0070% | 51,358,098 | 66.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.033% | 5,822,332 | 67.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.055% | 4,722,407 | 66.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.081% | 1,658,266 | 66.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 1,247,083 | 68.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 800,697 | 66.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.15% | 729,856 | 66.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.17% | 478,540 | 68.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 549,196 | 68.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 316,263 | 67.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.24% | 305,507 | 63.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 191,211 | 66.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.29% | 211,694 | 69.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 73,525 | 59.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 40,526 | 69.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 5,659 | 65.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.38% | 51,368 | 62.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.40% | 28,458 | 73.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 30,396 | 71.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 27,295 | 73.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 145,012 | 69.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.49% | 31,794 | 69.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 6,462 | 64.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 2,246 | 69.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 15,207 | 56.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 43,706 | 65.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 10,209 | 64.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 273 | 56.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.76% | 2,095 | 74.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 23,805 | 65.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90% | 36,089 | 68.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 27,829 | 72.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94% | 8,635 | 71.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 29,545 | 61.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 17,914 | 68.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.04% | 6,995 | 65.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 36,749 | 70.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 15,934 | 65.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.52% | 197 | 51.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.58% | 12,045 | 65.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 1,137 | 70.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 8,242 | 65.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 1,221 | 56.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.91% | 19,842 | 76.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 15,244 | 71.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.00% | 13,247 | 67.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.18% | 17,261 | 69.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.04% | 6,775 | 73.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.19% | 2,961 | 77.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.62% | 1,473 | 66.6% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.03% | 133 | 62.4% |