Ethiopian In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Ethiopian In Labor Force | Age > 16
69.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,268,503 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.652 and weighted average of 69.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.55% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ethiopians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ethiopians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Ethiopians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Ethiopia (69.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Somali (69.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Somalia (69.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Sierra Leonean (68.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (68.9%, a difference of 0.63%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Immigrants from Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 69.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 69.3% |
Somalis | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 69.2% |
Immigrants from Somalia | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 69.1% |
Sierra Leoneans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 68.9% |
Immigrants from Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 68.9% |
Immigrants from Cameroon | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 68.7% |
Immigrants from Sierra Leone | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 68.5% |
Immigrants from Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 68.5% |
Immigrants from Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 68.4% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 68.0% |
Immigrants from Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 68.0% |
Liberians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 67.8% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Ethiopian In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ethiopian Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.064% | 59.7% |
Maximum | 33.0% | 89.5% |
Range | 32.9% | 29.8% |
Mean | 6.5% | 71.9% |
Median | 4.9% | 70.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 69.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 73.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 5.4% |
Correlation Details
Ethiopian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.064% | 143,253,421 | 65.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 34,870,543 | 66.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.40% | 14,257,552 | 68.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 7,873,284 | 69.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74% | 3,684,016 | 67.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 3,648,446 | 70.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 2,842,926 | 69.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 2,517,090 | 71.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 1,584,290 | 71.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.56% | 1,750,526 | 71.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 964,864 | 70.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 807,230 | 69.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.07% | 384,379 | 68.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.21% | 545,505 | 71.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.39% | 176,307 | 69.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.55% | 381,336 | 67.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 263,366 | 69.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.92% | 212,401 | 70.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 469,698 | 68.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 236,713 | 72.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.38% | 286,416 | 69.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.54% | 229,912 | 75.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.65% | 62,039 | 69.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.84% | 100,273 | 72.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.03% | 156,701 | 71.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18% | 125,408 | 69.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.36% | 78,603 | 73.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.52% | 264,356 | 75.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 48,890 | 69.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82% | 84,569 | 71.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.03% | 132,495 | 70.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.23% | 164,741 | 67.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.33% | 55,439 | 73.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.53% | 94,052 | 72.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.69% | 26,996 | 75.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.78% | 4,017 | 59.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.02% | 26,595 | 63.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.18% | 45,072 | 80.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.33% | 44,863 | 69.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.71% | 14,098 | 69.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.89% | 61,169 | 67.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.05% | 24,581 | 66.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 101,620 | 78.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.43% | 26,573 | 76.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.74% | 18,324 | 63.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.40% | 30,927 | 71.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.65% | 64,730 | 73.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.97% | 535 | 80.9% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.36% | 25,823 | 75.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 50,049 | 76.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.81% | 38,318 | 70.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.38% | 5,359 | 75.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.67% | 26,684 | 73.2% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.73% | 1,885 | 85.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.66% | 3,514 | 68.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.16% | 4,023 | 71.7% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.31% | 14,553 | 71.4% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.66% | 121 | 85.0% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.48% | 105 | 89.5% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.97% | 182 | 85.2% |