Iranian In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Iranian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Iranian In Labor Force | Age > 16
66.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,907,854 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Iranians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.460 and weighted average of 66.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iranians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.31% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Iranians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Iranians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Iranians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Iranians by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from Laos (66.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Chilean (66.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Aleut (66.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South America (66.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (66.0%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Central Americans | 99.4 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Mongolians | 99.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| South Americans | 99.4 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| South American Indians | 99.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Bermudans | 99.3 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants from Laos | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Iranians | 99.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Aleuts | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants from South America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants from Cambodia | 99.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants from Uruguay | 99.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 98.9 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 98.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants from Chile | 98.7 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Iranian In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iranian Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.097% | 42.1% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 73.0% |
| Range | 49.9% | 30.9% |
| Mean | 10.4% | 61.8% |
| Median | 6.9% | 64.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 56.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 66.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.0% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 7.0% |
Correlation Details
| Iranian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.097% | 228,887,169 | 65.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 45,827,599 | 67.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.63% | 16,975,760 | 67.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 7,337,858 | 66.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 4,475,429 | 66.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.39% | 6,266,456 | 66.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.69% | 1,882,535 | 66.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 913,168 | 66.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.20% | 716,559 | 65.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.47% | 562,320 | 63.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.79% | 556,803 | 66.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.95% | 246,192 | 62.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 274,439 | 68.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 597,935 | 66.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.82% | 257,349 | 65.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.13% | 74,773 | 67.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.29% | 95,989 | 64.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.59% | 81,131 | 66.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.77% | 175,713 | 66.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.11% | 8,205 | 47.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.34% | 13,175 | 67.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.54% | 24,167 | 67.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.89% | 82,117 | 72.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.44% | 71,129 | 66.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.68% | 69,278 | 68.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.94% | 35,333 | 66.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.27% | 26,318 | 61.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.41% | 52,741 | 73.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 64,485 | 64.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.06% | 50,392 | 50.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.77% | 37,705 | 64.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.92% | 23,669 | 63.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.23% | 577 | 52.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.72% | 9,169 | 63.3% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.13% | 5,589 | 55.3% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.98% | 7,868 | 61.1% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.77% | 1,445 | 54.6% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.05% | 11,289 | 64.9% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.21% | 366 | 42.3% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.47% | 9,699 | 57.7% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.02% | 11,060 | 56.7% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.20% | 16,652 | 60.3% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.51% | 32,963 | 58.8% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.45% | 233 | 42.1% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.15% | 19,180 | 52.7% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.60% | 1,139 | 62.0% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.85% | 1,350 | 53.0% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.30% | 9,105 | 56.1% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.51% | 642 | 51.6% |
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.42% | 5,593 | 54.1% |
[ 50.0% - 50.5% ] 50.00% | 44 | 65.9% |