Chickasaw vs Yup'ik In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Yup'ik
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Chickasaw
Yup'ik
62.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Yup'ik In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,722,257 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 62.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,964,003 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.276 and weighted average of 62.7%, a difference of 0.64%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Yup'ik |
Minimum | 28.7% | 32.3% |
Maximum | 76.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 47.4% | 67.7% |
Mean | 55.2% | 63.0% |
Median | 56.5% | 63.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 50.9% | 54.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 61.1% | 70.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.2% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 12.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Yup'ik by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Kiowa (62.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Arapaho (62.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Yakama (62.1%, a difference of 0.25%), American (62.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and Ottawa (62.0%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Potawatomi (62.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Kiowa (62.4%, a difference of 0.45%), Yaqui (63.0%, a difference of 0.56%), Chippewa (63.1%, a difference of 0.66%), and Iroquois (63.2%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 63.4% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 63.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 63.3% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 63.2% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 63.2% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 63.2% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 63.1% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 63.0% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 62.8% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 62.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 62.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 62.3% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 62.1% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 62.1% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 62.1% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 62.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 62.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 62.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.9% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.8% |