Cypriot In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Cypriot
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Cypriot In Labor Force | Age > 16
65.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cypriot In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,870,589 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cypriots and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151 and weighted average of 65.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cypriots within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.3% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Cypriots and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Cypriots influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Cypriots simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Cypriots by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Cypriots are Tlingit-Haida (65.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Romania (65.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Oceania (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Indian (Asian) (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and Latvian (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Immigrants from Taiwan | 90.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants from Costa Rica | 90.8 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Samoans | 90.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Indians (Asian) | 89.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Latvians | 89.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants from Romania | 88.6 /100 | #144 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 88.3 /100 | #145 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Cypriots | 88.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 87.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Bhutanese | 86.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants from Albania | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | 81.9 /100 | #150 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Czechs | 81.5 /100 | #151 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Yugoslavians | 81.3 /100 | #152 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants from China | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 65.4% |
Cypriot In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cypriot Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.0054% | 45.1% |
| Maximum | 3.3% | 80.3% |
| Range | 3.3% | 35.2% |
| Mean | 0.72% | 63.8% |
| Median | 0.51% | 65.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.23% | 60.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 0.85% | 67.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.62% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.78% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.77% | 6.6% |
Correlation Details
| Cypriot Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.0054% | 33,992,200 | 67.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.020% | 16,345,509 | 65.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.040% | 3,122,899 | 66.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.056% | 2,025,949 | 66.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.073% | 1,660,900 | 65.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.087% | 948,516 | 66.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.11% | 605,700 | 67.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.12% | 475,906 | 63.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.14% | 338,136 | 69.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.15% | 323,402 | 61.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.17% | 297,258 | 65.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 252,801 | 65.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.20% | 237,752 | 65.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 66,984 | 59.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.24% | 114,977 | 60.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.26% | 52,284 | 64.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 88,713 | 66.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.29% | 30,773 | 58.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.30% | 138,334 | 73.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 75,903 | 65.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.34% | 27,039 | 66.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 82,290 | 58.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 31,446 | 68.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.40% | 74,319 | 59.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.41% | 16,818 | 67.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 36,914 | 65.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 23,085 | 70.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.48% | 71,901 | 67.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.51% | 22,510 | 68.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 1,312 | 50.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.58% | 3,626 | 48.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 13,064 | 61.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 9,234 | 60.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67% | 6,444 | 58.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 2,337 | 62.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 36,028 | 69.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 5,140 | 65.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.76% | 3,040 | 53.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78% | 2,050 | 63.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.79% | 12,186 | 70.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 7,458 | 61.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 8,096 | 64.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 18,748 | 72.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.86% | 10,694 | 65.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 9,413 | 62.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 36,842 | 67.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 716 | 74.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 4,268 | 80.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.00% | 57,046 | 55.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 2,591 | 54.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 3,128 | 48.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 17,110 | 70.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 463 | 45.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.99% | 11,788 | 68.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 910 | 71.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 2,847 | 56.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.26% | 2,792 | 56.4% |