Immigrants from Morocco In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Morocco
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Immigrants from Morocco In Labor Force | Age > 16
67.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Morocco In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,912,438 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 67.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Morocco within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Morocco and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Morocco influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Immigrants from Morocco simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Morocco by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Morocco are Thai (67.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Zaire (67.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Zimbabwean (67.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (67.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (67.3%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 67.5% |
| Immigrants from Uganda | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 67.5% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 67.4% |
| Ugandans | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 67.4% |
| Immigrants from Africa | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 67.4% |
| Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 67.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 67.3% |
| Immigrants from Morocco | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 67.2% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 67.2% |
| Immigrants from Zaire | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 67.2% |
| Ghanaians | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Immigrants from Congo | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Immigrants from Ghana | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Immigrants from South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 67.1% |
Immigrants from Morocco In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Morocco Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.040% | 51.9% |
| Maximum | 20.1% | 77.8% |
| Range | 20.1% | 25.9% |
| Mean | 2.9% | 65.8% |
| Median | 1.8% | 67.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.91% | 63.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.2% | 69.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 5.8% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Morocco Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.040% | 140,164,148 | 66.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.14% | 21,990,434 | 67.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.24% | 6,980,894 | 66.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 2,808,774 | 69.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 1,874,100 | 67.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.55% | 1,762,049 | 68.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 779,669 | 70.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 865,891 | 69.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.86% | 378,600 | 68.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 294,174 | 65.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 254,252 | 70.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.15% | 132,535 | 66.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 92,241 | 69.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 84,292 | 69.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 74,049 | 66.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.55% | 55,312 | 65.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.69% | 183,497 | 69.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 11,637 | 64.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 3,591 | 57.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 33,016 | 68.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.06% | 9,683 | 53.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 320 | 63.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 979 | 69.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.39% | 14,619 | 71.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.48% | 4,350 | 63.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.69% | 20,155 | 67.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.98% | 19,531 | 77.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 1,804 | 63.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 5,121 | 65.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.34% | 1,975 | 52.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.30% | 465 | 51.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.74% | 548 | 55.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.02% | 5,120 | 69.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.51% | 890 | 55.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.81% | 2,566 | 68.3% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.46% | 332 | 75.4% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.12% | 825 | 67.7% |