Turkish vs Chippewa Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Chippewa
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Turks
Chippewa
15.8%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.8%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Chippewa Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,864,079 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.340 and weighted average of 15.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,159,389 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302 and weighted average of 18.8%, a difference of 19.3%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 55.4% | 100.0% |
| Range | 52.1% | 97.9% |
| Mean | 19.6% | 33.0% |
| Median | 16.4% | 24.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.0% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.4% | 40.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 25.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 24.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 24.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Father Poverty
Demographics Similar to Turks by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Africa (15.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Bulgarian (15.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Latvia (15.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Danish (15.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Argentinean (15.8%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Chileans | 96.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| South American Indians | 96.2 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Australians | 96.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 96.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Pakistanis | 95.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Turks | 95.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 95.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Bulgarians | 94.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.7 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Danes | 94.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Argentineans | 94.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 93.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Nonimmigrants (18.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Potawatomi (18.9%, a difference of 0.44%), Delaware (18.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and Chickasaw (19.0%, a difference of 0.76%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.6% |
| French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 19.0% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 19.0% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 19.1% |