Turkish vs Chippewa Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Turkish
Chippewa
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Turks
Chippewa
9.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.0%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Chippewa Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,671,610 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,987,125 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.354 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 55.1%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Chippewa |
Minimum | 1.9% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 23.1% | 56.1% |
Range | 21.2% | 54.1% |
Mean | 9.7% | 21.1% |
Median | 8.7% | 18.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.3% | 24.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 10.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 9.9% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Turks by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Indonesia (9.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Australia (9.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Bulgarian (9.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Cuba (9.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Turkey (9.7%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Venezuelans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Apache (14.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Arapaho (15.1%, a difference of 0.66%), Potawatomi (14.8%, a difference of 1.4%), Comanche (14.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and Black/African American (14.7%, a difference of 1.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.6% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 14.7% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 14.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 14.9% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 15.0% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.1% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 15.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 15.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |