New Zealander vs Argentinean Female Poverty
COMPARE
New Zealander
Argentinean
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
New Zealanders
Argentineans
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
90.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Argentinean Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,893,684 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.095 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,942,880 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.270 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 0.43%.
![New Zealander vs Argentinean Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/female-poverty/new-zealanders-vs-argentineans-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | New Zealander | Argentinean |
Minimum | 1.9% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 35.3% | 23.9% |
Range | 33.4% | 22.4% |
Mean | 11.5% | 10.5% |
Median | 9.6% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders and Argentineans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Albanian (12.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Sri Lankan (12.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (12.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Hungary (12.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and French Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), South African (12.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Belarus (12.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |