Immigrants from Lebanon vs Zimbabwean Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lebanon
Zimbabwean
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Lebanon
Zimbabweans
10.5%
MALE DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
MALE DISABILITY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lebanon vs Zimbabwean Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,152,652 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.176 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,379 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 0.47%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lebanon | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 3.6% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 24.3% | 28.1% |
Range | 20.7% | 25.0% |
Mean | 11.4% | 11.3% |
Median | 10.3% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 12.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lebanon and Zimbabweans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lebanon are Sierra Leonean (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Lithuania (10.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (10.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Serbia (10.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and Laotian (10.6%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Jordan (10.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Chile (10.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Guyana (10.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Poland (10.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and Bulgarian (10.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Guyanese | 99.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.2 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Colombians | 99.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Ecuadorians | 99.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.0 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 98.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Laotians | 98.6 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 98.6 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Zimbabweans | 98.4 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 98.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 98.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.1 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Bulgarians | 98.1 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Sri Lankans | 97.9 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 97.9 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.6% |