Immigrants from Canada vs Immigrants from Guyana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,400,242 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana within Immigrant from Canada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.901. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Canada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.079% in Immigrants from Guyana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Canada corresponds to an increase of 78.8 Immigrants from Guyana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 55.1%), median family income ($112,374 compared to $92,513, a difference of 21.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,402 compared to $90,186, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,373 compared to $40,773, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,411 compared to $55,726, a difference of 4.3%), and median earnings ($50,192 compared to $45,204, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 74.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 49.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.31%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and single male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 52.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 42.2%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 42.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 35.4%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 16.6%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.78%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (64.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 237.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 92.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 79.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 29.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 64.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 79.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 90.7%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 69.0%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 49.5%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 38.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.23%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.70%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.6%).