Icelander vs Choctaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Icelander
Choctaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Icelanders
Choctaw
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
68.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Choctaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,599,836 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,566,788 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.682 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 31.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Icelander | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 0.64% | 10.4% |
| Maximum | 57.1% | 70.2% |
| Range | 56.5% | 59.8% |
| Mean | 12.2% | 22.2% |
| Median | 10.3% | 19.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.4% | 24.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 10.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Icelanders by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Armenian (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Venezuela (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Guamanian/Chamorro (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Venezuelan (11.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Nepal (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Honduran (14.3%, a difference of 0.47%), Seminole (14.3%, a difference of 0.67%), Somali (14.3%, a difference of 0.88%), African (14.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and Dutch West Indian (14.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 14.6% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.7% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |