Icelander vs Choctaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Icelander
Choctaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Icelanders
Choctaw
12.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Choctaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,220,666 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.672 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,568,106 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.512 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 36.3%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Icelander | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 9.1% | 5.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 90.9% | 95.0% |
| Mean | 37.1% | 30.9% |
| Median | 25.0% | 23.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 17.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 59.3% | 34.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 46.1% | 16.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 31.8% | 20.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 30.8% | 20.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Icelanders by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Serbian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Kenya (12.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Russian (12.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Jordan (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Venezuelan (12.4%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Nicaraguans | 92.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 91.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 90.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Venezuelans | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 12.4% |
| Icelanders | 88.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Serbians | 87.9 /100 | #122 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 87.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Russians | 87.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 87.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Romanians | 86.4 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 86.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 85.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Immigrants from Yemen (16.9%, a difference of 0.72%), Creek (16.8%, a difference of 0.83%), Central American Indian (17.2%, a difference of 1.6%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and Osage (16.5%, a difference of 3.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.6% |