Guyanese vs Immigrants from China Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Guyanese
Immigrants from China
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Guyanese
Immigrants from China
16.7%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.6%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guyanese vs Immigrants from China Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,625,032 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067 and weighted average of 16.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,770,317 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.239 and weighted average of 9.6%, a difference of 74.8%.

Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guyanese | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 36.6% | 21.7% |
Range | 35.6% | 20.6% |
Mean | 15.6% | 8.1% |
Median | 14.4% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.0% | 9.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 4.3% |
Similar Demographics by Receiving Food Stamps
Demographics Similar to Guyanese by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Immigrants from Barbados (16.6%, a difference of 0.52%), Sioux (16.8%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Jamaica (16.9%, a difference of 0.98%), U.S. Virgin Islander (16.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and Immigrants from Guyana (16.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.3% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.5% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.5% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 16.5% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 16.6% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.9% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Cambodian (9.5%, a difference of 0.25%), Croatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Netherlands (9.5%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Bolivia (9.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (9.5%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Cambodians | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | China | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Australians | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Russians | 99.4 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.4 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 9.6% |