Crow vs Immigrants from Dominican Republic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,978,107 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominican Republic within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.843. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.543% in Immigrants from Dominican Republic. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 542.8 Immigrants from Dominican Republic.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $37,306, a difference of 17.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,337 compared to $80,319, a difference of 12.6%), and median household income ($63,681 compared to $70,208, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $36,857, a difference of 4.5%), median family income ($76,605 compared to $81,233, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $78,836, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 64.8%), single father poverty (30.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 64.4%), and single male poverty (23.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (26.3% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 8.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (26.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (26.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 180.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 176.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 144.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (8.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (26.2% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 23.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.4%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 27.6%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.35, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 0.68%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (65.3% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 184.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 138.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 115.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 30.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 67.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 115.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 107.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (37.6% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 0.93%), nursery school (99.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and kindergarten (99.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 70.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 28.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 1.4%), disability (12.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.4%).