Crow vs Slovak Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,771,613 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Slovaks within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.379. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Slovaks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 24.3 Slovaks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 51.5%), per capita income ($31,729 compared to $44,229, a difference of 39.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $101,029, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $49,753, a difference of 5.8%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $39,029, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $59,039, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 137.6%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 103.8%), and male poverty (19.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 88.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 23.8%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 27.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 51.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 233.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 230.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 225.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 56.9%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 29.9%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.06, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 3.1%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 33.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 40.3%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 35.4%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.84%), nursery school (99.7% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.94%), and kindergarten (99.7% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 37.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 24.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.25%), disability (12.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and male disability (13.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.4%).