Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,059,199 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Russians within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.129. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 12.5 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,827 compared to $53,154, a difference of 33.5%), median family income ($94,472 compared to $120,487, a difference of 27.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $116,328, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $54,389, a difference of 11.6%), median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $44,169, a difference of 16.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $67,626, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Russian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 43.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 41.8%), and family poverty (10.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.11%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.56%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.8%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.12, a difference of 5.3%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.10%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 88.5%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 60.4%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 21.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 20.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.1%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.2%).