Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 315,235,384 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Russians within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.067. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to a decrease of 8.9 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,531 compared to $53,154, a difference of 14.2%), median family income ($108,161 compared to $120,487, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,232 compared to $110,398, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $54,389, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($42,084 compared to $44,169, a difference of 5.0%), and median earnings ($49,648 compared to $53,334, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Russian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 20.6%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 18.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.89%), single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 8.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.39%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.22%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.12, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 31.3%), professional degree (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.1%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 17.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.080%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.1%).