Finnish vs Romanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Finnish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Finns

Romanians

Good
Excellent
6,815
SOCIAL INDEX
65.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
141st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Romanian Integration in Finnish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 318,325,370 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to an increase of 26.7 Romanians.
Finnish Integration in Romanian Communities

Finnish vs Romanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,461 compared to $48,445, a difference of 11.5%), median household income ($83,607 compared to $91,994, a difference of 10.0%), and median male earnings ($54,721 compared to $60,063, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,827 compared to $53,632, a difference of 3.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $64,142, a difference of 7.7%).
Finnish vs Romanian Income
Income MetricFinnishRomanian
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,461
Exceptional
$48,445
Median Family Income
Average
$102,676
Exceptional
$111,243
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,607
Exceptional
$91,994
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,940
Exceptional
$50,244
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,721
Exceptional
$60,063
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,173
Exceptional
$41,663
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,827
Exceptional
$53,632
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$94,610
Exceptional
$102,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$99,904
Exceptional
$108,609
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$59,535
Exceptional
$64,142
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.6%
Tragic
28.0%

Finnish vs Romanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 16.3%), single female poverty (21.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.060%), poverty (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.76%).
Finnish vs Romanian Poverty
Poverty MetricFinnishRomanian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.3%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Tragic
13.6%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Poor
21.5%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.9%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.0%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.4%

Finnish vs Romanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.49%).
Finnish vs Romanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricFinnishRomanian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.9%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.2%

Finnish vs Romanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.18%).
Finnish vs Romanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricFinnishRomanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.5%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.9%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.7%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Excellent
83.1%
Good
83.0%

Finnish vs Romanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.2%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.58%), currently married (48.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.71%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.81%).
Finnish vs Romanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricFinnishRomanian
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.1%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.09
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.7%
Exceptional
28.7%

Finnish vs Romanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 42.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.4%).
Finnish vs Romanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricFinnishRomanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.3%
Average
55.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.3%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.3%
Fair
6.2%

Finnish vs Romanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.6%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.0%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.38%).
Finnish vs Romanian Education Level
Education Level MetricFinnishRomanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.4%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Exceptional
90.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.2%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.9%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.2%
Exceptional
62.4%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.3%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
36.7%
Exceptional
41.6%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.2%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Exceptional
2.1%

Finnish vs Romanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 24.7%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.25%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Finnish vs Romanian Disability
Disability MetricFinnishRomanian
Disability
Tragic
12.7%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
12.6%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Fair
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
22.9%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.2%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Good
2.4%