Cherokee vs Romanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Romanians

Fair
Excellent
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Romanian Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 345,179,033 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.020. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 1.4 Romanians.
Cherokee Integration in Romanian Communities

Cherokee vs Romanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $48,445, a difference of 30.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $102,544, a difference of 26.8%), and median household income ($72,682 compared to $91,994, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $53,632, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $64,142, a difference of 18.5%).
Cherokee vs Romanian Income
Income MetricCherokeeRomanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Exceptional
$48,445
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Exceptional
$111,243
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Exceptional
$91,994
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Exceptional
$50,244
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Exceptional
$60,063
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Exceptional
$41,663
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Exceptional
$53,632
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Exceptional
$102,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Exceptional
$108,609
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Exceptional
$64,142
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
28.0%

Cherokee vs Romanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 35.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 34.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and single father poverty (19.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 18.7%).
Cherokee vs Romanian Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeRomanian
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.4%

Cherokee vs Romanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 30.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.3%).
Cherokee vs Romanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeRomanian
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%

Cherokee vs Romanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.8%).
Cherokee vs Romanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeRomanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Good
83.0%

Cherokee vs Romanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 27.6%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 23.6%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.11%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and family households (65.0% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.64%).
Cherokee vs Romanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeRomanian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
28.7%

Cherokee vs Romanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 41.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.1%).
Cherokee vs Romanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeRomanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Average
55.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Fair
6.2%

Cherokee vs Romanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 60.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 51.1%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.080%).
Cherokee vs Romanian Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeRomanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
90.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Exceptional
62.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
41.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.1%

Cherokee vs Romanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 45.8%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.4%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.3%).
Cherokee vs Romanian Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeRomanian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Fair
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Good
2.4%