Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,480,990 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Immigrants from Uzbekistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to an increase of 7.1 Immigrants from Uzbekistan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $98,849, a difference of 17.3%), per capita income ($40,152 compared to $46,929, a difference of 16.9%), and median male earnings ($50,408 compared to $57,941, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 0.31%), householder income over 65 years ($56,615 compared to $56,331, a difference of 0.50%), and median family income ($93,748 compared to $103,197, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 25.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 22.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 1.3%), single mother poverty (31.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and family poverty (10.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 32.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 31.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 42.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 34.5%), and single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.35%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 118.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 57.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 19.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 36.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 49.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.3%), master's degree (14.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 25.4%), and bachelor's degree (35.8% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.050%), high school diploma (87.9% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and 5th grade (97.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 53.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.7%).