Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,072,943 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.181. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Immigrants from Uzbekistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to a decrease of 25.1 Immigrants from Uzbekistan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 15.6%), householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $56,331, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $54,846, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($57,145 compared to $57,941, a difference of 1.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $98,849, a difference of 1.7%), and median earnings ($48,673 compared to $50,151, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 41.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 36.9%), and receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.65%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 26.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.9%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 12.3%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.19%), currently married (47.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.97%), and family households (65.0% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 208.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 78.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 24.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 50.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 66.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 27.4%), master's degree (16.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 33.3%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.1%).