U.S. Virgin Islander vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,121,328 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in U.S. Virgin Islanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 U.S. Virgin Islanders corresponds to an increase of 47.8 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,589 compared to $43,997, a difference of 17.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,736 compared to $96,086, a difference of 16.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,911 compared to $91,171, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,424 compared to $38,945, a difference of 6.9%), householder income over 65 years ($52,072 compared to $56,975, a difference of 9.4%), and median earnings ($41,448 compared to $45,682, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (22.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 32.0%), receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 32.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 7.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.0%), and single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 25.1%), male unemployment (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 27.9%), births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 16.7%), and married-couple households (39.8% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.82%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (62.6% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 28.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.5% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 24.5%), master's degree (13.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.010%), 3rd grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and 4th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 24.1%), ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.3%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 5.4%).