Immigrants from Norway vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,688,306 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.805. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.726% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to an increase of 726.5 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,217 compared to $43,997, a difference of 18.7%), median family income ($115,847 compared to $98,205, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,629 compared to $91,171, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $52,302, a difference of 2.6%), median female earnings ($42,837 compared to $38,945, a difference of 10.0%), and wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 24.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 24.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 0.76%), single female poverty (20.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 21.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.7%), and births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.8%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.67%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 42.4%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 31.7%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.19%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.90%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.1%).