Uruguayan vs Immigrants from Canada Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Immigrants from Canada
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Uruguayans
Immigrants from Canada
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
91.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Immigrants from Canada Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,837,387 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,621,148 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.751 and weighted average of 20.2%, a difference of 0.18%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Uruguayan | Immigrants from Canada |
Minimum | 9.0% | 17.0% |
Maximum | 83.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 74.3% | 83.0% |
Mean | 32.4% | 49.2% |
Median | 19.7% | 41.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.5% | 22.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.6% | 70.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 36.1% | 48.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.7% | 28.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.1% | 28.3% |
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans and Immigrants from Canada by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Pakistani (20.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (20.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Venezuela (20.2%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Canada are Immigrants from Iraq (20.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Venezuela (20.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Nepal (20.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Slovene (20.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from England (20.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |