Russian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Russian
Select to Compare
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Russian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
10.0%
POVERTY | SENIORS > 65
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Russian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,778,613 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.654 and weighted average of 10.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.1% in poverty level among seniors over the age of 65.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Russians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Russians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 within an area, or if Russians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Russians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Turkish (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (10.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Yugoslavian (10.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (10.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Immigrants from Netherlands | 98.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants from Austria | 98.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Canadians | 98.5 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Australians | 98.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Samoans | 98.0 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 97.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Palestinians | 97.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Russians | 97.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Turks | 97.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 97.8 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| New Zealanders | 97.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants from South Africa | 97.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 97.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants from Ireland | 97.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Koreans | 97.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Russian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Russian Data | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Data |
| Minimum | 0.22% | 0.56% |
| Maximum | 71.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 71.7% | 99.4% |
| Mean | 16.9% | 16.4% |
| Median | 14.4% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.7% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.5% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.2% | 21.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.1% | 21.3% |
Correlation Details
| Russian Percentile | Sample Size | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 234,350,714 | 11.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67% | 126,385,402 | 9.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 58,713,112 | 9.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.60% | 35,809,025 | 9.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.07% | 24,827,114 | 12.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 8,339,386 | 8.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.98% | 5,608,589 | 9.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.44% | 3,310,390 | 8.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.92% | 2,440,033 | 8.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.34% | 2,278,461 | 9.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82% | 1,252,042 | 8.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.30% | 1,302,604 | 9.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.73% | 736,718 | 8.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.23% | 780,449 | 7.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.71% | 621,991 | 8.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.18% | 379,760 | 10.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.63% | 452,538 | 10.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.08% | 292,134 | 8.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.49% | 114,946 | 8.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.91% | 222,187 | 7.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.39% | 149,874 | 9.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.80% | 85,846 | 22.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.39% | 60,613 | 5.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.88% | 25,293 | 9.9% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.29% | 25,489 | 9.5% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 13,116 | 6.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.06% | 31,914 | 11.1% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.58% | 1,113 | 19.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.93% | 13,967 | 6.3% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.66% | 3,690 | 12.7% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.01% | 15,944 | 5.3% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.43% | 12,353 | 5.6% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.08% | 7,202 | 5.5% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 960 | 6.6% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.81% | 5,237 | 8.1% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.28% | 2,211 | 6.3% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.83% | 4,861 | 9.0% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.25% | 1,554 | 6.8% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.60% | 83,069 | 26.7% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.18% | 198 | 8.2% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.61% | 2,289 | 20.7% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.21% | 2,108 | 24.8% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.46% | 2,937 | 7.7% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.90% | 842 | 7.9% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.36% | 618 | 13.3% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.84% | 87 | 38.0% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.40% | 1,906 | 10.3% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.68% | 291 | 6.7% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.19% | 789 | 6.4% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.16% | 178 | 31.7% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.57% | 395 | 32.4% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.28% | 666 | 3.2% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.18% | 891 | 0.56% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.83% | 120 | 6.2% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.12% | 137 | 10.0% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.54% | 319 | 2.3% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.07% | 402 | 6.4% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.14% | 74 | 100.0% |
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.21% | 129 | 65.2% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.12% | 979 | 20.7% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.33% | 178 | 36.1% |
[ 47.0% - 47.5% ] 47.06% | 51 | 100.0% |
[ 71.5% - 72.0% ] 71.88% | 128 | 100.0% |