Russian vs Cherokee Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Russian
Cherokee
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Russians
Cherokee
19.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Russian vs Cherokee Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 497,545,833 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.601 and weighted average of 19.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,754,756 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267 and weighted average of 25.7%, a difference of 33.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Russian | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 8.3% | 10.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 91.7% | 90.0% |
| Mean | 31.0% | 37.0% |
| Median | 20.1% | 33.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.7% | 26.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.8% | 42.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.1% | 16.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.3% | 15.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.1% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Russians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Cambodian (19.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Lithuanian (19.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Sri Lankan (19.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (19.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (19.1%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Cambodians | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Palestinians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Iroquois (25.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |