Russian vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Russian
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Russians
Chinese
19.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Russian vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 497,545,833 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.601 and weighted average of 19.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 18.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Russian | Chinese |
| Minimum | 8.3% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 43.0% |
| Range | 91.7% | 41.7% |
| Mean | 31.0% | 16.1% |
| Median | 20.1% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.7% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.8% | 20.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.1% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.3% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.1% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Russians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Cambodian (19.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Lithuanian (19.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Sri Lankan (19.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (19.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (19.1%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Cambodians | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Palestinians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |