Immigrants from Thailand Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Select to Compare
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Immigrants from Thailand Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
21.5%
POVERTY | FEMALES 18-24
64.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 308,847,286 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.225 and weighted average of 21.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.2% in poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Thailand and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Thailand influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 within an area, or if Immigrants from Thailand simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Luxembourger (21.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Laos (21.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Carpatho Rusyn (21.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (21.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and New Zealander (21.4%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
| Immigrants from Nepal | 65.7 /100 | #245 | Good 21.3% |
| British West Indians | 65.5 /100 | #246 | Good 21.3% |
| Nepalese | 65.4 /100 | #247 | Good 21.3% |
| Immigrants from Singapore | 65.1 /100 | #248 | Good 21.4% |
| Immigrants from West Indies | 65.0 /100 | #249 | Good 21.4% |
| Immigrants from Dominica | 65.0 /100 | #250 | Good 21.4% |
| New Zealanders | 64.9 /100 | #251 | Good 21.4% |
| Immigrants from Thailand | 64.5 /100 | #252 | Good 21.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 64.5 /100 | #253 | Good 21.5% |
| Immigrants from Laos | 64.2 /100 | #254 | Good 21.6% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 64.2 /100 | #255 | Good 21.6% |
| Immigrants from Eastern Africa | 64.1 /100 | #256 | Good 21.6% |
| West Indians | 64.0 /100 | #257 | Good 21.6% |
| Aleuts | 63.6 /100 | #258 | Good 21.7% |
| French American Indians | 63.5 /100 | #259 | Good 21.7% |
Immigrants from Thailand Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand Data | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Data |
| Minimum | 0.062% | 10.0% |
| Maximum | 18.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 17.9% | 90.0% |
| Mean | 3.2% | 27.4% |
| Median | 2.4% | 21.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 27.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 18.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 18.4% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Thailand Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.062% | 218,680,211 | 20.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 55,309,421 | 19.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 18,172,426 | 21.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.50% | 6,481,451 | 20.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 2,989,623 | 20.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.76% | 2,087,524 | 24.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 874,798 | 26.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 999,027 | 20.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 405,935 | 24.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 446,644 | 30.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.51% | 524,195 | 21.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 261,404 | 25.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.80% | 343,294 | 25.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.92% | 281,120 | 23.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.07% | 5,743 | 49.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.30% | 94,980 | 21.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.41% | 132,675 | 20.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.52% | 50,606 | 21.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.70% | 111,371 | 21.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.85% | 2,917 | 14.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.96% | 33,545 | 32.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 321,492 | 29.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.29% | 70,179 | 20.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.40% | 1,351 | 11.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 14,187 | 18.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.87% | 47,391 | 27.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18% | 3,327 | 28.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.79% | 1,314 | 23.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.17% | 227 | 88.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.05% | 78,618 | 25.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.23% | 19,606 | 13.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.87% | 223 | 100.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.00% | 461 | 10.0% |