Immigrants from Thailand vs Jamaican Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Jamaican
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Jamaicans
22.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
5.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
232nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
14.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs Jamaican Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,832,710 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.442 and weighted average of 22.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 363,369,042 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 21.6%, a difference of 1.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | Jamaican |
| Minimum | 7.0% | 4.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 50.0% |
| Range | 93.0% | 45.6% |
| Mean | 33.5% | 20.9% |
| Median | 27.4% | 21.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.3% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.4% | 24.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.1% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.8% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.6% | 7.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand and Jamaicans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Welsh (22.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Western Africa (22.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Tlingit-Haida (21.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Salvadoran (21.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Portugal (21.9%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Guamanian/Chamorro (21.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (21.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Ecuadorian (21.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Barbados (21.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (21.7%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Jamaicans | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 21.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 13.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 21.6% |
| Ecuadorians | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 21.7% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 11.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 21.7% |
| Nepalese | 9.7 /100 | #218 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Panamanians | 9.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Germans | 8.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 8.0 /100 | #221 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 7.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Scottish | 7.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Barbadians | 7.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 21.8% |
| English | 6.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 5.8 /100 | #226 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 5.8 /100 | #227 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Salvadorans | 5.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 5.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 5.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Welsh | 5.0 /100 | #231 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 22.0% |