Immigrants from North America vs Kenyan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from North America
Kenyan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from North America
Kenyans
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
68.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from North America vs Kenyan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,673,972 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.752 and weighted average of 20.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,254,696 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032 and weighted average of 20.8%, a difference of 2.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from North America | Kenyan |
| Minimum | 17.0% | 6.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 36.9% |
| Range | 83.0% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 49.1% | 22.4% |
| Median | 41.8% | 21.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.7% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.4% | 26.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 47.6% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.9% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 28.4% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North America and Kenyans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Immigrants from Uganda (20.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.57%), and Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |