Immigrants from North America vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,396,839 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Immigrant from North America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from North America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from North America corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,302 compared to $41,495, a difference of 18.8%), median family income ($112,151 compared to $97,958, a difference of 14.5%), and median male earnings ($60,265 compared to $53,704, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,307 compared to $55,543, a difference of 4.2%), median female earnings ($41,319 compared to $39,376, a difference of 4.9%), and median earnings ($50,108 compared to $46,333, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 34.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.47%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.89%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 24.0%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.41%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 43.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 30.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.94%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 87.2%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 73.1%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 48.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 22.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 9.0%).