Immigrants from Australia vs Dutch West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,330,876 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.417. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.174% in Dutch West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 173.8 Dutch West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $35,922, a difference of 61.3%), median family income ($126,620 compared to $81,852, a difference of 54.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($119,308 compared to $79,171, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 7.1%), householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $45,816, a difference of 23.7%), and median female earnings ($46,573 compared to $34,106, a difference of 36.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 59.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 57.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 57.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 9.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 17.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 40.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 44.3%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 42.5%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.4%), married-couple households (46.5% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 23.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 122.9%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 110.4%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 96.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 66.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 61.7%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 61.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.9%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 13.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 31.6%).