Hispanic or Latino vs Zimbabwean Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Hispanic or Latino
Zimbabwean
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Hispanics or Latinos
Zimbabweans
24.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
295th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hispanic or Latino vs Zimbabwean Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 554,629,261 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.712 and weighted average of 24.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,078,290 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 26.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hispanic or Latino | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 17.1% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 51.2% | 59.7% |
Range | 34.2% | 58.6% |
Mean | 25.7% | 18.9% |
Median | 23.9% | 18.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.8% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.3% | 23.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 12.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 11.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Hispanics or Latinos by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hispanics or Latinos are French American Indian (24.6%, a difference of 0.35%), African (24.8%, a difference of 0.48%), American (24.5%, a difference of 0.49%), Alsatian (24.5%, a difference of 0.57%), and Immigrants from Central America (24.8%, a difference of 0.76%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 24.5% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 24.5% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 24.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 24.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 24.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 24.8% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |