Ecuadorian vs Northern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 258,518,255 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Northern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 2.5 Northern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 23.4%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $64,658, a difference of 17.6%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $110,635, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $40,491, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $51,678, a difference of 4.3%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $48,887, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 52.8%), receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 51.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.4%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 29.9%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 28.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.1%), currently married (43.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 11.7%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 186.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 63.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 18.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 42.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 56.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 87.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 53.0%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 41.9%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 37.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.68%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.5%).