Immigrants from Belarus vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,359,860 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.058. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to a decrease of 11.0 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($62,658 compared to $54,508, a difference of 14.9%), per capita income ($50,303 compared to $44,206, a difference of 13.8%), and median earnings ($53,043 compared to $46,952, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $62,215, a difference of 0.090%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,743 compared to $52,979, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 18.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.83%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.86%), and single male poverty (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 20.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.89%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 23.8%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.1%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 38.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 32.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 18.9%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and bachelor's degree (45.0% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 30.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.18%), female disability (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.3%).